Aragon Court · interactive mechanism simulation

Disputants file cases with a fee → the court drafts jurors from the staked-ANJ pool by sortition → jurors commit & reveal votes in a Schelling game → the majority splits fees and the minority's slashed stake, or the ruling is appealed to a bigger panel. Edit the parameters to see how demand, panel size, and appeals interact.
Disputants file case + fee Aragon Court drafts 3 jurors (sortition) Juror pool ANJ staked, drafted by stake Commit → Reveal hidden votes, then revealed Ruling majority wins fees, minority slashed Appeal escalation appeal → bigger panel current panel: 3 Reward & slash 0 ANJ slashed
Disputes filed
0
Jurors drafted (cumulative)
0
ANJ slashed (illustrative)
0
Appeals escalated
0
Court legitimacy
100%
Parameters — edit me
3 jurors
2.0×
25%
20%
18/min
Controls

Illustrative simulation. Defaults mirror the researched Aragon Court mechanism (3-juror initial panels drafted by stake-weighted sortition, commit-reveal Schelling voting, minority slashing, and appeal escalation to bigger panels), but dispute sizes, timing, and outcomes are randomized for visualization — not live onchain data. The "Void a ruling" button replays Aragon One's real decision to void its first mock dispute, showing how an override can crash the court's legitimacy. Part of The Onchain Experiment Atlas.