DAOstack · interactive mechanism simulation

Holographic consensus: proposals enter a slow, safe absolute-majority queue. Predictors stake GEN on whether each proposal will pass. Once net staking crosses a threshold, the proposal is "boosted" into a fast relative-majority track where reputation holders decide quickly and the Avatar executes — releasing treasury funds. Correct predictors are rewarded; wrong ones lose their stake.
Proposer submits proposal Proposal queue absolute-majority · slow track pending: 0 Predictors stake GEN, up / down Genesis Protocol net: 0 / 150 GEN Boosted queue relative-majority · fast track boosted: 0 Rep. voters non-transferable reputation Avatar (treasury) 60.0 ETH Predictor rewards win rate: —
Proposals submitted
0
Boosted (fast-tracked)
0
Treasury
0.0 ETH
Stalled in slow queue
0
Predictor win rate
— 0 resolved
Parameters — edit me
150 GEN
5.0/s
65%
50%
12/min
Controls
Illustrative: predictor demand for GEN collapses (as it did in practice) — boosting stalls, proposals back up in the slow queue, and the treasury only drains via rare slow-track approvals. This mirrors why DAOstack wound down in 2022.

Illustrative simulation. Mirrors the researched DAOstack mechanism (holographic consensus: GEN-staked prediction market boosts proposals from a slow absolute-majority queue into a fast relative-majority queue; reputation-weighted voting; Avatar treasury execution), but proposal sizes, timing and outcomes are randomized for visualization — not live onchain data. Drag the sliders or trigger the failure mode to explore the flywheel. Part of The Onchain Experiment Atlas.