Molecule · interactive mechanism simulation

Funders stake & lock capital into a crowdsale → proceeds fund a lab's research agreement → Molecule mints an IP-NFT → the Tokenizer fractionalizes it into IPTs. A licensing exit (the payoff funders are betting on) almost never fires — that illiquidity is the point.
Funders stake $VITA + ETH StakedLockingCrowdSale raised 0.0 / 80 ETH BioDAO Treasury 0.0 ETH Lab / researcher sponsored-research agreement IP-NFT mint (ERC-721) 0 IP-NFTs minted legal rights, document-gated Tokenizer 0 IPTs circulating Licensing exit (rare) 0 exits · no major payout yet ~2% of matured projects
IP-NFTs minted
0
BioDAO treasury
0.0 ETH
IPTs circulating
0
Licensing exits (royalty events)
0
Parameters — edit me
1.2/s
80 ETH
3×
6 mo
2.0%
Controls

Illustrative simulation. Defaults mirror the researched Molecule mechanism (IP-NFT mint & Tokenizer fractionalization into IPTs, StakedLockingCrowdSale requiring staked/time-locked purchases, BioDAO treasuries funding lab agreements) but contribution sizes, timing, and the exit chance are simplified for visualization — not live onchain data. The low default exit chance reflects the documented fact that no IP-NFT-funded therapy has reached a major licensing payout yet. The "Bear market" button illustrates how volatile-token treasuries shrank in 2021-22 downturns. Drag the sliders to explore the funding flywheel. Part of The Onchain Experiment Atlas.