NFTX · interactive mechanism simulation

NFT holders mint fungible vTokens by depositing into a per-collection vault (1:1 backed), redeem by burning a vToken for a pooled NFT, and trade vTokens on an AMM. Vault fees split between inventory stakers and LPs; fresh deposits carry a decaying "Dutch auction" premium fee.
NFT Holders deposit / redeem / trade wallet activity NFTX Vault (per-collection) 0 NFTs pooled premium 1.00× (fresh-deposit decay) vToken supply 0 vTokens (1:1 backed) Inventory Staking earns 20% of fees 0.000 ETH pool AMM Pool (vToken/ETH) LPs earn 80% of fees + trades 0.000 ETH pool
Actions simulated
0
NFTs pooled / vToken supply
0
Cumulative fees collected
0.000 ETH
Fee split — staking vs. LP
stakingLP
Parameters — edit me
5.0%
20%
2.0×
4s
1.2/s
Controls
Illustrative: trading demand has collapsed, so fee revenue and vault activity dry up — mirrors NFTX's commercial underperformance when NFT volumes fell.

Illustrative simulation. Reflects the researched NFTX mechanism (mint/redeem/swap into per-collection vaults, ~3–10% fees split ~20% inventory staking / ~80% LPs, and a Dutch-auction-style premium on freshly deposited NFTs), but ETH values, floor prices, and timing are randomized for visualization — not live onchain data. Part of The Onchain Experiment Atlas.