Relevant · interactive mechanism simulation

Votes are weighted by each voter's reputation, not their stake. When high-reputation voters concur, curation rewards accrue off-chain, then must be signed by an admin key before they can be claimed on Ethereum as REL — and above a limit, wrapped into non-transferable sREL for DAO governance.
Voters vote weighted by rep Community feed ranks posts by weighted vote Reputation engine PageRank/EigenTrust score Off-chain ledger 0.0 REL accrued Admin attestation signs claim requests RelevantTokenV3 0.0 REL claimed sREL (non-transferable) 0.0 sREL staked Relevant DAO Governor + Timelock
Reputation-weighted votes
0
Rewards accrued (off-chain)
0.0 REL
REL claimed on-chain
0.0 REL
sREL staked (governance)
0.0 sREL
Claims stuck at admin key
0.0 REL
Parameters — edit me
65%
45%
10%
80 REL
2.0/s
Controls

Illustrative simulation. Defaults mirror the researched Relevant mechanism (reputation-weighted, non-plutocratic curation voting; off-chain reward accrual claimed via an admin-signed attestation into RelevantTokenV3; a per-account claim limit above which balances convert to non-transferable sREL for DAO governance) — but vote sizes and timing are randomized for visualization, not live onchain data. Try the failure button: it recreates how a trusted-admin bridge left the "decentralized curation protocol" custodial at its core until the DAO renounced token ownership in 2024. Part of The Onchain Experiment Atlas.